Pundit shares ‘no fun’ verdict amid Rangers and Celtic SPFL controversy
Tam McManus has suggested it’s “no fun” watching Rangers and Celtic dominate the Scottish Premiership week in and week out.
The debate has once again resurfaced after Alan Brazil suggested the Old Firm leaving would “kill” the domestic game in Scotland (AceOdds, relayed by Football Scotland, 15 March).
McManus has claimed the issue must be discussed amongst the “bigwigs” of Scottish football to allow younger players to develop.
“It’s no fun for anyone watching Celtic and Rangers beat everyone three, four and five every week,” said McManus (PLZ Football show, 07m 30s, 15 March).
“It’s no fun for Hearts, Hibs and Aberdeen fans who want to be competitive, there’s a massive chasm and something needs to be discussed amongst the bigwigs in Scottish football.”
Change
Change is required, but not a drastic reform. A special aspect of Scottish football is the Old Firm and the power the two clubs hold. Realistically, a number of teams would struggle to survive without Celtic and Rangers.
The issues lie deeper. Far too many Scottish Premiership sides are reluctant when it comes to giving younger players a chance. Instead, they’re happy to utilise journeymen from the lesser leagues in England. Potentially expanding the league could well be the answer.
Due to how small the Scottish Premiership is, a run of defeats can turn a good campaign into a poor one. This can lead to managers feeling pressure when they potentially shouldn’t be. This can then see younger players not being given a chance.
A larger league will lead to bigger gaps between relegation and midtable which could be a good thing. There has also been talk of the Old Firm making the move south of the border – and that’s a scenario which could occur in the future. It would be intriguing to see the impact on the Scottish game if they did opt to depart.
In other Rangers news, a plan to see the Bears pay £50million to other Scottish clubs “will happen” according to one manager.